2005 Proton Gen-2 vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (290 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2005 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Proton Gen-2 | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Proton | Jeep |
| Model | Gen-2 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1943 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2916 mm |
