2005 Renault Clio vs. 1949 Toyota SA
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1949 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1949 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 5 kg more than 1949 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1949 Toyota SA | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | SA |
Year Released | 2005 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2410 mm |