2005 Renault Clio vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 360 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Renault | Saab |
Model | Clio | 92 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1460 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |