2005 Renault Clio vs. 1963 Renault 4
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 515 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 1963 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | Clio | 4 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1460 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |
