2005 Renault Clio vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 590 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Renault | Suzuki |
| Model | Clio | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 18 HP |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2060 mm |
