2005 Renault Clio vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 150 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Clio | 220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1460 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |
