2005 Renault Clio vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Renault | Sunbeam |
| Model | Clio | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 27 L |
