2005 Renault Clio vs. 1971 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Toyota Corona (98 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 170 kg more than 1971 Toyota Corona.
Because 1971 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Toyota Corona (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1971 Toyota Corona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1971 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Corona |
Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1460 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 51 L |