2005 Renault Clio vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (108 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Clio | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |