2005 Renault Clio vs. 1972 Volvo 164

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 164 (156 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 164 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Volvo 164 (241 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Renault Clio 1972 Volvo 164
Make Renault Volvo
Model Clio 164
Year Released 2005 1972
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1148 cc 2978 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 101 Nm 241 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 69 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.8 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 10.1:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 985 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 3780 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2400 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 60 L