2005 Renault Clio vs. 1976 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 320 kg more than 1976 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 1976 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Clio | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |
