2005 Renault Clio vs. 1981 Zastava 750

To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 525 kg more than 1981 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: