2005 Renault Clio vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 555 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (100 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | Clio | 9 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2945 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4650 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2440 mm |
