2005 Renault Clio vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 370 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (101 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Renault | Zastava |
Model | Clio | 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2160 mm |