2005 Renault Clio vs. 1988 Toyota Model F
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Toyota Model F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Toyota Model F (76 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Toyota Model F should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota Model F weights approximately 125 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 Toyota Model F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Toyota Model F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Toyota Model F (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (101 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1988 Toyota Model F will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1988 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Model F |
Year Released | 2005 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2240 mm |