2005 Renault Clio vs. 1990 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Volkswagen Passat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Volkswagen Passat would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volkswagen Passat (157 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 240 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Volkswagen Passat is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Volkswagen Passat will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Volkswagen Passat (225 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1990 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1990 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Renault | Volkswagen |
Model | Clio | Passat |
Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.9 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.6 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |