2005 Renault Clio vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Rover 200 (121 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 15 kg more than 1993 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Rover 200 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1993 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 121 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |