2005 Renault Clio vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1994 Rover 400. (88 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 170 kg more than 1994 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 1994 Rover 400 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2957 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4650 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 22.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2560 mm |