2005 Renault Clio vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rover 45 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (108 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Rover 45. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 45.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 45. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 2000 Rover 45 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 45 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 54 L |