2005 Renault Clio vs. 2001 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2001 SsangYong Musso. (149 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2001 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 415 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 2001 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 SsangYong Musso (318 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 2001 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 2001 SsangYong Musso has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 SsangYong Musso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 2001 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Renault | SsangYong |
Model | Clio | Musso |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2957 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4650 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 10.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 73 L |