2005 Renault Clio vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Scenic II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Scenic II would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Scenic II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Scenic II (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Scenic II should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Scenic II weights approximately 240 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Scenic II (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Scenic II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
| Make | Renault | Renault |
| Model | Clio | Scenic II |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.4 seconds | 12.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.9 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
