2005 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Lancia Musa
To start off, 2009 Lancia Musa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,248 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lancia Musa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lancia Musa (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lancia Musa should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lancia Musa weights approximately 293 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lancia Musa (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Lancia Musa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 2009 Lancia Musa has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Lancia Musa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 2009 Lancia Musa | |
| Make | Renault | Lancia |
| Model | Clio | Musa |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1148 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 69.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 170 km/hour | 173 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1278 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |
