2005 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Saab 05-Sep

To start off, 2009 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,290 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (256 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saab 05-Sep weights approximately 413 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (258 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2009 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Renault Clio 2009 Saab 05-Sep
Make Renault Saab
Model Clio 05-Sep
Year Released 2005 2009
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1460 cc 2290 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 73 HP 256 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 105 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 1700 RPM 1900 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 17.9:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1165 kg 1578 kg
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1800 mm
Fuel Consumption 4.3 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 5.3 L/100km 13.1 L/100km