2005 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | Clio | Micra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 46 L |