2005 Renault Clio vs. 2013 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Passat (168 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 296 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen Passat (240 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2013 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 2013 Volkswagen Passat has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Passat will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 2013 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Renault | Volkswagen |
Model | Clio | Passat |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1460 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4868 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1487 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2803 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.3 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.3 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |