2005 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,247 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 454 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Grand Scenic | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Renault | Studebaker |
| Model | Grand Scenic | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1854 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2980 mm |
