2005 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 458 kg more than 2005 Renault Grand Scenic.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Grand Scenic | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Renault | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Grand Scenic | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 81 L |
