2005 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 978 kg more than 2005 Renault Grand Scenic.
Because 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Grand Scenic | 1979 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Renault | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Scenic | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 2748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 107 L |