2005 Renault Laguna vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2005 Renault Laguna is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Tempo (129 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2005 Renault Laguna. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Laguna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Laguna weights approximately 155 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Laguna (270 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm). This means 2005 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Laguna | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Laguna | Tempo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 204 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |