2005 Renault Laguna vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Laguna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Laguna would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Renault Laguna. (167 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Laguna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Laguna (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Laguna | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Laguna | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.3 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 57 L |