2005 Renault Laguna vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Laguna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Laguna would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2005 Renault Laguna. (167 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Laguna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 198 kg more than 2005 Renault Laguna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Laguna. (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Laguna. 2005 Renault Laguna has automatic transmission and 2013 Nissan Z has manual transmission. 2013 Nissan Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Laguna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Laguna | 2013 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Renault | Nissan |
| Model | Laguna | Z |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11:01:00 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1573 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4246 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1326 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.3 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |
