2005 Renault Megane vs. 1964 Simca 1000

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Simca 1000. (43 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1964 Simca 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 900 kg more than 1964 Simca 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (101 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Simca 1000. (64 Nm). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Simca 1000. 2005 Renault Megane has automatic transmission and 1964 Simca 1000 has manual transmission. 1964 Simca 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Megane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: