2005 Renault Megane vs. 1968 Triumph 1300
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 1300. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 785 kg more than 1968 Triumph 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (101 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Megane | 1968 Triumph 1300 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Megane | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 915 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2460 mm |
