2005 Renault Megane vs. 1973 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 108 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 655 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (163 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Megane | 1973 Chrysler 160 | |
| Make | Renault | Chrysler |
| Model | Megane | 160 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1115 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |
