2005 Renault Megane vs. 1978 Volvo 260

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 420 kg more than 1978 Volvo 260.

Because 1978 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 260 (219 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1978 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: