2005 Renault Megane vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,869 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (143 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 860 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (174 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Megane | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Megane | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1869 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1060 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |