2005 Renault Megane vs. 1996 Toyota Lexcen
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Lexcen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Lexcen would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Lexcen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Lexcen (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Lexcen should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 265 kg more than 1996 Toyota Lexcen.
Because 1996 Toyota Lexcen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota Lexcen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Lexcen (304 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1996 Toyota Lexcen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Megane | 1996 Toyota Lexcen | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Megane | Lexcen |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 304 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1385 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |