2005 Renault Megane vs. 2003 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 320 kg more than 2005 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane. 2003 Toyota Mark II has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Mark II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Megane | 2003 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Megane | Mark II |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |