2005 Renault Megane vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Megane would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane.
Because 2012 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Megane | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | Megane | F-350 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |
