2005 Renault Megane vs. 2012 Ford F-450
To start off, 2012 Ford F-450 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Megane would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane.
Because 2012 Ford F-450 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm) has 980 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Megane | 2012 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Megane | F-450 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 399 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 1085 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 4379 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 142 L |