2005 Renault Megane vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Megane | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Megane | Matrix |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |