2005 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 130 kg more than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Megane | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | Megane | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1640 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 51 L |
