2005 Renault Megane vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 290 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2013 Toyota Matrix is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Megane | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Megane | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1480 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
