2005 Renault Scenic vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (110 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 685 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (101 Nm). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Scenic | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Scenic | 220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1015 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 45 L |
