2005 Renault Scenic vs. 1997 Volvo S70
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Volvo S70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Volvo S70 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Volvo S70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo S70 (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Renault Scenic. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo S70 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Scenic (191 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo S70. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo S70.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Scenic | 1997 Volvo S70 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Scenic | S70 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 173 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |