2005 Renault Scenic vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 15 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 2005 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (180 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Scenic | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Scenic | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 178 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |