2005 Renault Scenic vs. 2012 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2012 Chrysler 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler 200 (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Renault Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 2 kg more than 2012 Chrysler 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chrysler 200 (225 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (99 Nm). This means 2012 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Scenic | 2012 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Renault | Chrysler |
Model | Scenic | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1768 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |