2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1565 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche (739 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 581 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Triumph |
| Model | Corniche | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 739 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2735 kg | 1170 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 64 L |
