2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 1969 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1969 Toyota Corona. (95 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1969 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1480 kg more than 1969 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (490 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Toyota Corona. (137 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | 1969 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
Model | Park Ward | Corona |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5379 cc | 1707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 322 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 490 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 51 L |