2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser

To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP) has 168 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.

Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (490 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward has automatic transmission and 2011 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: